Of course I get it , and yes Haaland was only ever going to choose City over any other PL club.
What erked me slightly was the then stance that we were not prepared to go above 50 mill in the current window only to bust that ceiling a little later , yes by then they could factor in funds that had started to flow into the club.
In short Any where other than Manchester City
Who said this and when?
Curious as I was going off comment by one of the post match pundits !
Best way to appease fans is pretend you werenât ever in for him [Haaland].
If the money issue was the case then itâs likely a bluff. If you add in wages it may be true.
Read that back to myself a few times. Makes no sense whatsoever.
Not sure thatâs what club owners are particularly interested in most of the time.
And even if you can appease them, then it wonât be for long.
Huh? Has the world gone mad!?
Goalkeeping nieceâs first full game for Lewes of the championship in a friendly against WSL side West Ham last weekend. Nothing too remarkable about that, they go 1-0 down thanks to sloppiness at the near post & then concede a penalty.
Go on to win 2-1. Encouraging start 
Nice save!
In all my years of supporting my club , this is the best itâs ever been run.
Owner has put a lot of money into the infrastructure to make us a sustainable championship club.
Now some more American investors have got involved. 
They really were a horrible team
Name in the book, word in his ear, now get on with the game.
Just the year before that, Sunderland - or rather Ritchie Pitt - decided to get their retaliation in first
What is going on here?
More fraud.
Simple as that
Everything thatâs wrong with football.