Where are the “men” in that video?
Buffoons 
Sadly, grist for the mill on Night Tube. “The Mayor of London panders to drunks for popularity” shocker 
My piles bleed for him, the cunt.
My brother, who’s a retired Met DCI, spent a lot of his career in SE London and knows that family all too well, no surprise or sympathy forthcoming, nasty bunch of cunts who wouldn’t give a shit what happened to anyone who got in their way.
Guys, guys, you’ve got it all wrong - all human life is precious, even the worthless thieving parasitic scum.
And all 7-fucking-Billion of us are unique special fucking snowflakes, and not-at-all relentlessly selfish, planet-killing, resource-hogging, viruses-with-shoes…
Shame on you! Your chosen imaginary sky-fairy is now cross with you 
Well I think he was a very naughty boy impaling himself on that nice mans knife, the things folk will do to avoid trial.
My imaginary sky-fairy got cross with me once…
That won’t be happening again - one of the benefits of shopping around for your imaginary sky-fairy needs.
My new sky-fairy has a much easier time than the last one, as I decided that watching over all mankind was overkill when you consider that there are only about 20 people in the world who don’t make me want to vomit.
Marvelous
Welcome back my precioussssssss.
Come, my be-laddered beauty, let’s away and ride your 86 diesel horses to make some housewifes hot again.
is that a No Parking sign I can see on those shutters?
Dunno. I drive a white (ish) van. Signs are meaningless.
Nice to see that we still have tradesmen with traditional values. ![]()
Housewives.
VB
“Has bucket, will travel.”
He’s Jockish, we have to make allowances ![]()
Well done for not mentioning the Ginger issue. I understand he gets the hump if someone so much as hints at the ginge-ness.

Well yes, he is a bit of a ginger nut, it’s a shame really as apart from being a Jockish, ginger pipe strangler he seems OK. Oh, except he likes big fat ugly blondes too, and fancies himself as a bit of a thespian
Yes he’s just a cunt really 
It would be easier to measure the small proportion of the AA membership who wouldn’t be subject to the gravity surcharge.
I think there could be a significant number who claim that the fundamental forces of physics don’t apply to them and that to tax them would be an infringement of their human right to freedom of religion.
VB

