I know the S is the heaviest version with a steel arm tube and the fx was introduced with an alloy tube to be a lower mass version but where does the bog standard 64 come into the mix.
I’m seeing loads of the fx versions around, does this still have enough mass to be a good match for the Io?
Io 1 has aluminum side cheeks, so is lighter. The 2 is basically a 1 with gunmetal sides (heavier), the Gold is a 2 with permendur polepieces and the Ltd. is field coil rather than the AlNiCo magnets of the others.
In theory, the 1 has higher compliance, at least according to the website, but I don’t believe it. I reckon they use the same cantilever assembly, so will still favour a heavier arm.
UK Io 2 is probably closest to original IIv from the 80’s.
In that case, given the usually stated acceptable range for resonant frequency of between 7 and 12 hz it should be fine at 8.3 hz (if my calculations are correct)
I’d have thought it’s rather heavy fir a PT, I had it on the Voyd Reference and the suspension had to be wound right up. Not ideal, it would really need re-springing with heavier springs.
I love the oracle, don’t dismiss the Thorens though, I remember you mentioned you fancied one. Great decks and can be matched with loads of different arms. I don’t think the FR 64 would be better on a PT than the PU7.
I have an FR64s and am waiting in vain for a sensibly priced FRs3 head shell for the Gold, seem too be quite expensive. Any ideas for alternatives? Anyone tried Orsonic AV101B ?
To be fair, it still sounded awesome on the Voyd. It was ok levelling and bounced fine, I just wasn’t happy with having to wind the suspension up so much.
I want a Breuer to try.
Speaking of headshells, I think @murrayjohnson has my Audio Note one. (In tasty brown). Can you confirm, Guy?