Time-of-death-based pedantry. I’m here for it! ![]()
Tommaaay is peaceful, innit, not far right, just right…
What a fucking cess pit.
Sadly this is what happens when one pedants in haste, ask @Kevin
Introduce an alternative gladiatorial contest.
Miscreant Ready, Chimpanzee Ready. I’d pay to watch .
Well that explains that weird walk they do.
Lesson 1)
You can never edit misplaced pedantry fast enough on this forum
Someone always replies before you can edit!
Lesson 1) No one will appreciate your attempts at pedantry - decide how much you want to be disliked ![]()
You are right, people never appreciate having their ignorance pointed out to them
![]()
Yes a pedant’s fail is made all the more pleasurable by their misplaced assumptions!
It follows the publication of a now-deleted post on her X account, stating: "Mass deportation now, set fire to all the fucking hotels full of the bastards for all I care… If that makes me racist, so be it.”
It does. The mask has slipped. Now everyone knows who she really is. From now on may she always be referred to as the racist Lucy Connolly.
Don’t suppose it’ll do much for her childminding business either.
Still, it should leave plenty of availability for EDL supporters’ kids, so the prospect of an ‘all nazi’ nursery could be on the cards. Every cloud…
I’m just trying to square that with her deleted post. The best I can come up with is that she’ll cry as she watches their houses burn to the ground.
Or Social Services need to ask about how her own kids are treated.
Is it pedantic to respond pedantically to a poor attempt at pedantry?
Does one cancel out the other?
I think this needs to be debated.
Urgently.
Along with the fate of those poor pheasants.
Yeahbut…
Is ‘nit-picking pedantry’ really two things?
A tautology to be precise. ![]()
Indeed - but that’s still one thing, isn’t it?
Not wanting to be pedantic, obviously.
I don’t think one thing on it’s own can be tautological
But if two words or phrases are sufficiently similar as to form a tautology, are they two different things, or just one thing expressed twice?
