[quote=“julian2002, post:140, topic:14374, full:true”]
So I have memory issues. Doesn’t make me wrong.
What is this place again?
[/quote]
Tickled me a bit, you even repeated the Matt Lucas in Polar bit in both posts!
![]()
[quote=“julian2002, post:140, topic:14374, full:true”]
So I have memory issues. Doesn’t make me wrong.
What is this place again?
[/quote]
Tickled me a bit, you even repeated the Matt Lucas in Polar bit in both posts!
![]()
He double means it
#GentlemenOfACertainAge
Bugger off.

This man pondered his orb and came-up with the right answer:
The question was “Who?”, now it’s “Who cares?”
Ruined. Doomed.
Once you cede artistic control to an algorithm driven streaming platform…
Citadel anyone?
Because Bond has always been solely about the artform and never about the commercial tie ins.
Well we don’t know who will play Bond himself next, but this is an excellent development:
It’s about as good news I I could have wished for.
I love his films and have watched many of them several times (unusual for me).
Next, the script…
It’s going to be Timothy Chalamet isn’t it?
Aargh!
Gammon baiting casting would be fun.
He would be so good I reckon.
He’d need a better tailor.
If only we knew a man for the job…
Bond costume budget > BBC budget
He needs a bit more acting range first.