Donald Trump finally announced as some massive in-joke (Part 2)

  • Overvalued his penthouse at Trump Tower in New York by claiming that it was three times its actual size

He should have went all out and gone for eleven times then claim he got sq metres confused with sq ft. Would have been more plausible and he could have got a dig in at the metric system for good measure.

1 Like

ISWYDT :wink:.

4 Likes

Using the same measurement calibration by which he is 6’3" and 215 pounds?

5 Likes

Should have got him in to measure my garage :rofl:

15 Likes

I suspect he might have being thinking about horses and measuring using hands…

3 Likes

I thought he did, hence the problem.

Yeah… About that:

One of them Norfolk orses

1 Like

15 hands, according to the orange shit-gibbon…

4 Likes

ffs, could have put crocs on the poor buggers feet instead of woke suede.

1 Like

https://twitter.com/BidenHQ/status/1713974158650950001?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

3 Likes

https://twitter.com/bmay/status/1716401279604285919?s=46

5 Likes

7 Likes

When I questioned a racist cunt about their views on immigration, I got the same response.

Thick; deluded cunts have no other response to being challenged on a topic in which they are totally fucking clueless.

:sunglasses:

2 Likes

There’s a useful quote - I know it from Christopher Hitchens but not sure if he coined it. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”. If you’re going to claim some outlandish shit, you need to at least be offering up some evidence for it to be vaguely worth my time to consider it.

1 Like

Also known as the Sagan Standard. The Wiki article traces it back to the early 19th century and possibly even to David Hume.

Hardliners aren’t very comfortable with the introduction of ‘extraordinary’ to a principle since it’s a subjective word. As far as they’re concerned we can either prove, definitively, any claim we make or we can’t. If we can’t then the claim is unjustified whether it’s extraordinary or not. The rest of us draw a line somewhere and accept whatever we accept on the basis of its likelihood being over that line or not.

1 Like